Why are we still paying for Sarah Ferguson?
Shelagh Fogarty questions the public funding of a disgraced prince and his ex-wife.
The Royal Family has reached another tipping point, with a simple yet uncomfortable question: why are we still paying for Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson?
The release of Virginia Giuffre's book has brought Prince Andrew's disgrace back into the public eye, with allegations he continues to deny.
- Allegations against Prince Andrew have not gone away.
- Reputational damage spreads, touching the King and the entire institution of the monarchy.
A heckler outside Lichfield Cathedral asked King Charles, "Have you asked the police to cover up for your brother?"
This question is one that any self-respecting journalist would ask in an interview, given the chance.
Author's summary: Public funding of Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson is questioned.
More News
- United States: Organising to resist mass immigrant raids
- To Solve Staffing Shortages, Home-Based Care Must Rethink Recruitment From The Ground Up
- Sam Altman Cancels His Tesla Roadster Reservation After Waiting 7.5 Years — 'It Has Felt Like a Long Time'
- PM vows full support to K-P govt for peace | The Express Tribune
- ‘South Park’: Melania Trump Possesses Pam Bondi to Expose JD Vance’s ‘Deception’ in Halloween Special
- High school football photos: the East View Patriots take on the Rouse Raiders
- The power of organising and how to win the outsourcing battle | Article | News | UNISON National
- American-Statesman Editorial Board - Austin American-Statesman